Skip to content

Circumcision and the development of autism and ADHD

by on 2015/01/30

A study of a large sample of boys that reported an association between circumcision during childhood and the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has not surprisingly received attention in the media and on social networking sites and blogs. The author, Professor Morten Frisch, has speculated about links between painful injuries and stress responses which has no doubt added to the controversy.

What did the research involve? 

The study, published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, examined more than 340,000 boys born in Denmark between 1994 and 2003. They examined the health outcomes of the boys at the age of 9 and reported that almost 5,000 cases of autism had been diagnosed. The study reported that circumcision raised the overall chances of an autism diagnosis by 46%. Basically the study involved comparing two different datasets and reporting correlations/associations between variables. As we have noted previously within our How to ‘Research the Headlines’ series, correlation does not equal causation and a whole range of other (known as confounding) variables could explain the link (rendering the link effectively meaningless potentially).

What did the researchers say?

In a press release on the study findings, the lead author Morten Frisch, outlined that the study was partially motivated by animal findings that linked a single painful injury to lifelong deficits in stress response. He went on to state that “painful experiences in neonates have been shown in animal and human studies to be associated with long-term alterations in pain perception, a characteristic often encountered among children with ASD”. The inference then is that the act of circumcision leads to the development of these developmental disorders.

What did the media say?

Clearly the study is very much an exploratory/speculative study and caution is needed in making any direct inference from the findings. So did the media take this cautious approach? Well actually they did and they followed this path very carefully calling on experts in the field, for example, in evaluating the study. The Daily Mail reported the opinions of Professor Jeremy Turk, a Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, as well as reporting comments from Dr. Rosa Hoekstra, a Lecturer in Psychology at the Open University. Both raised caution about the speculative nature of the study and noted that confounding variables were highly likely to account for the findings. They additionally sought the opinion of a representative of Milah UK, a body that speaks for the Jewish community on issures related to circumcision. Their representative, Prof. David Katz also commented on the correlational nature of the study within the Daily Mail coverage. The Daily Mail also included a subheading ‘experts have urged caution over the extremely speculative findings’ and so if the reader does not go beyond the initial headlines and read the story they should still get the gist that the link is likely to be speculative.

Speculation by researchers

We have on many occasions, here at Research the Headlines, commented when journalists have been over speculative. There are frequently examples where researchers are overly speculative in press releases and when communicating with the media. Caution is essential, especially when the topic concerns such sensitive issues as the cause of a lifelong psychological disorder, which has serious consequences for the development of the child and has significant effects on the family. Fortunately on this occasion the media were careful in their reporting on these speculative findings.

Frisch, M. & Simonsen, J. (2015). Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. DOI:10.1177/0141076814565942

  1. Circumcision is practiced mainly by the Jewish and Islamic community and did the researchers take this on board for it would need no detailed research to prove a link. If a link existed It simply would have been so obvious and noticeable before now as extra prevalent in those communities.

  2. Circumcision has been done for centuries but most would contend that autism is a new and escalating phenomenon. So how could circumcision increase the risk of autism? What has changed about circumcision in recent times? One thing that we know has changed is the use of PARACETAMOL (acetaminophen, Tylenol) with the procedure to treat pain. This practice began in the mid 1990’s, with recommendations by WHO and the American Academy of Pediatrics. It has been shown that infants have significant difficulties metabolizing paracetamol in the first days of life. Paracetamol is known to have a narrow threshold of toxicity under the best of circumstances.

    Three studies investigating prenatal use of paracetamol have found adverse
    neurodevelopment in the offspring- ADHD and autism phenotypes in 3 year olds.
    It is not such a stretch to think paracetamol given directly to the infant
    could also have deleterious effects. The paracetamol hypothesis highly warrants further investigation.

    • The researchers are making a link between autism and circumcision based on the association between pain perception and autism. Most would acknowledge that autism is an escalating diagnosis because of changes in assessment and diagnosis rather than a new phenomenon.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Mental health in television soaps |
  2. ADHD in the news: Rory Bremner |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: