HT04: Does the media article link to the where the work is published and the original research team?
Welcome to part four of our How to “Research the Headlines” guide. By now, you should be familiar with some of our tips on how to address media reporting of research: make sure you read the whole article, not just potentially misleading headlines, and look out for quotes from and guidance from not only the authors of the research, but also some independent experts. Our next piece of advice regards the provenance of the research — does the news item provide links to the original study and those who carried it out?
The media have paid significant attention to a study that was published recently which looked at the financial cost of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in the U.S. and the U.K. Most of the media have lead with headlines referring to the high annual cost of ASD to the U.K. economy (£32 billion) and have compared this to the lower cost of cancer, heart conditions and strokes combined. So is this comparison fair? Read more…
So now we come to our third tip to help you to “Research the Headlines“.
Part 3: Are independent experts featured in the article?
Here at Research the Headlines, we often discuss how research findings may have been presented in a biased way by the media. This relationship goes both ways and, of course, researchers may play up or down particular findings for various reasons. As well as this, research findings may not always be placed in a broader context by the particular researcher who conducted the study or by the media. So an important issue we have consistently raised in Research the Headlines is whether independent experts featured in the article to help address this balance?
Part 2: What did the researchers actually say?
In the first part of our How to “Research the Headlines” guide, we suggested delving beneath the headline to get a fuller picture of the research being reported. Assuming you’re now in the meat of the story, what are some of the things you should you look for? One simple thing is whether or not the people who conducted the research are quoted in the report. Were they given an opportunity to put the research findings into their own words? Read more…